I have placed an order ... (Guerrilla discussion)

I dont know where the cat is located but I guess somewhere in the pipe. Need to find an alternative pipe then.
 
Screenshot_20250319_121139_eBay.jpg
Called "Bend Pipe"

It goes between the Header pipe and the Muffler, saves weight also.
 
I got the fuelx pro+ installed. Fits nicely under the seat but the switch is a bit of a challenge in my configuration at least with the light switch next to it and the mobile holder above. Had to turn it upside down but I guess it will still work :)

Did a short test ride, 50km, some seeming improvement but nothing to write home about regarding the power. still managed to kill the engine in 1st gear due to lack of torque. I drove it on position 6 so I can still give it some more juice.
I guess it needs a month or so of driving to come up with a real world eval - but one thing is certain, there is no 25% gain in torque as their advertisements promise.
 

Attachments

  • WhatsApp Image 2025-03-20 at 17.12.53_e2fe7f20.jpg
    WhatsApp Image 2025-03-20 at 17.12.53_e2fe7f20.jpg
    174.3 KB · Views: 8
  • WhatsApp Image 2025-03-20 at 17.12.54_63ffdc08.jpg
    WhatsApp Image 2025-03-20 at 17.12.54_63ffdc08.jpg
    109.2 KB · Views: 5
Half an Apple is not an Apple :cool:
Decat and do a Heat Cycle.;)
 
what is a heat cycle?
Screenshot_20250321_080937_YouTube.jpg
This Tiger NESS video shows it being done, ambient temperature needs to be taken into account, an Oil temp gauge would be handy also.
Watch this process at 10 and a half minutes into the video.

 
That guy fitted a KENT cam, so everything he finds about better performance in my view is due to that cam. I had a decat fitted to my BS6 and it did nothing other than introducing popping. I understand the theory behind it but at least in my case it did not pan out in practice.
 
When you had the decat fitted to the Bs6 did you do a Heat Cycle?
Because "popping is a sign of under fueling.
Where the Kent Cam he fitted would have been the "icing on the Cake" it would not have been as substantial as an improvement without modified inlet and exhaust .
 
Obviously no heat cycle, but then again I used a pt and fuelx, so which ecu is modified by it?
I felt a real kick from the kent, nothing from the decat .
 
They only have one ECU.
If by "They" you mean me - ECU stands for engine control unit. The original one, the PT and fuelx are all ECUs. The PT may be fixed in its programming but the fuelx is stated to "adapt" - whatever than means. so 2 out of 3 may be influenced.
also: he does this 30 minutes thing in the hopes it reaches 115C - but how does he know that this temperature is really reached?
The Guerrilla has an option to see the temperature of the coolant (not the oil) - the Bullet has none of this (unless you have a bluetooth dongle and the internal temperature is shown there). all a bit fishy in my book.
 
PT and Fx are not ECU,s.
The red box is an ECU, engine control units are far more complex than PT and Fx which modify the signals sent to the ECU.
Race dynamics do make all sorts of claims but they are not critically analysed.
 
Race dynamics do make all sorts of claims but they are not critically analysed.
agree.
however, the signals that are modified by PT and fuelx do influence the engine, hence they are ECUs, we can agree on the main ecu doing the most crunching but for the sake of the initial argument: if you run this funny test of which I never heard before then you should recognize that the other components may be influenced as well. However, I dont really believe this 30 minutes running does anything of consequence. and if it does the fuelx would adapt to that as well. I guess we can leave it at that. we are getting into hair splitting competition here.
 
Dog has a Flea that makes it scratch, so the Flea is a Brain? :LOL:
 
Dog has a Flea that makes it scratch, so the Flea is a Brain
If you had any knowledge about biology you would know how much influence your gut bacteria have on your decision making 😆
 
Back
Top